International
A Look Back at Global Trade in 2024
As Adam noted in his introductory message, 2024 was quite the year across the industry. It was a year marked by major events across the globe, from right here in the U.S. to major shipping lanes like the Red Sea. We saw periods of stability mixed with unforeseen catastrophes like the Baltimore bridge collapse.
Everyone had to be nimble, perhaps more than ever before, to keep supply chains moving in the face of adversity. Regulatory and procedural changes throughout the year are to be expected to a certain degree, but the number of outside factors that impacted the industry was staggering. It proved, once again, how flexible and resilient logistics providers have become in recent years.
We’ll take a look at some overall trends and news from 2024 through the lens of each sector of the industry and look ahead to changes coming in 2025.
International
While international shipping was impacted by a variety of events across the globe, it was actually a relatively stable year in regard to ocean rates. There were some spikes here and there, but nothing as drastic as we’ve seen in recent years.
“Capacity remained tight for the first half of 2024 that kept the freight rates elevated,” said Amy Rice, Vice President & Managing Director, Scarbrough International. “Rates did start to drop mid-year, but didn’t last long as fears of East Coast and Gulf Coast ports strikes loomed.”
Many importers made it through the inventory they stockpiled through the early COVID years, so shipping became much more stable and predictable. In some senses this was the first “normal” year we’ve seen since 2020.
That said, there were a few larger events that played a role in the rate spikes. The Red Sea crisis, which has been covered extensively throughout the year, caused a stir early in the year and never really went away. This caused shippers to hike rates and consider alternative routes, but didn’t overly impact the market. The brief dockworker strike also caused temporary spikes and congestion in the U.S. East and Gulf Coast ports, but those didn’t have any long-term effects on the market, either.
Trouble in the Red Sea
Ongoing conflict in the Middle East has spilled into the Red Sea and has been impacting trade and shipping routes since late 2023. This has included multiple attacks by Houthi rebels on passing cargo ships in 2024. The fear of further attacks caused carriers to reconsider much of their routing and plans for shipments.
Many carriers chose to use alternate shipping lanes to protect their cargo and personnel. As expected, new routes generally led to longer travel times and delays to cargo. Considering the intricate web of global logistics, this had a ripple effect on other shipments across the globe.
Longer transit times caused vessel schedules to get out of sync, leading to disruptions across the global supply chain. Markets that would never use the Red Sea felt the reverberations of the delays as they were made to wait for vessels to complete their previous trips before re-loading cargo and setting forth on subsequent trips. As one might expect, these factors also led to increased rates from carriers looking to protect their businesses.
ILA Negotiations and Strike
The other major event in the United States was the very public negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) as they sought to renew their master contract. The ILA covers dockworkers at every unionized port along the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts. When the two sides were ultimately unable to agree on a new contract, the ILA workers went on a brief strike until a temporary wage agreement brought them back to work. However, even a three-day strike was enough to cause some disruptions to shipments and supply chains.
The biggest shift we saw out of this was more freight being rerouted to the west coast of the U.S. to avoid any potential disruptions. As the negotiation deadline got closer, we saw more and more carriers prioritize the west coast to try to avoid any substantial delays should the strike have occurred for a longer period. We saw standard rate surcharges and spikes as a response to the threat of a strike, but overall, we can be relieved that we didn’t see more disruption as a result of the contentious and largely unsuccessful contract negotiations.
A Closer Look at Section 321 – De Minimis Imports
On top of Forced Labor and fentanyl crackdowns, U.S. CBP also took aim at De Minimis Imports during the latter half of 2024. CBP plays a major role in regulating imports into the United States, including assessing duties and taxes on imported goods. These duties are one of the ways in which the US encourages companies to purchase from US-based companies rather than from overseas parties, and as such, they are one of the largest expenditures for many imported goods outside of the cost of the goods themselves. It’s always a goal of companies to reduce their spend, so finding ways to reduce spend on duties is often a target of companies large and small alike without having to search for new sources of their imported goods.
One way companies reduce their duties is by taking advantage of low-value shipments where the value of the goods is below a certain threshold (called the de minimis threshold), meaning that these shipments are not subject to the duties and taxes that other larger shipments are subject to. The restrictions regulating these duty-free shipments are found in Section 321 of the 19 USC 1321. As such, these shipments are often referred to as either “Section 321 Shipments” or simply “De Minimis Shipments”.
Because of the clear advantages of de minimis shipments, CBP processes nearly 1 billion such shipments every year, and that number is only expected to grow. Online retail giants like Temu and Shein make up a large portion of these shipments, allowing them to take advantage of a business model that requires little to no import experience in order for their goods to enter the US. This allows them to keep costs low on imported goods while still shipping direct to the consumer without the intervention of a Customs broker for high levels of detail normally required for such shipments.
With the number of shipments coming in averaging over a million per day, CBP’s resources simply cannot keep up with the necessary level of scrutiny, leading to massive amounts of illicit goods such as narcotics, counterfeits, and unapproved regulated items being imported illegally into the US. This has forced CBP to crack down even further on illicit imports, and as of September of 2024, the current administration has put forward action to limit the number of items which qualify for de minimis treatment. These restrictions include requiring more information to clear a de minimis shipment (currently minimal information is required), removing exemptions for certain classes of goods (specifically those subject to additional tariffs for trade enforcement), and requiring additional filings for products regulated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
Additional effects of proposed legislation would further empower CBP to inspect and hold shipments that lacked proper information. To that end, CBP released a notice of proposed rulemaking in January 2025 announcing its intent to create a new process for screening these shipments.